Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Designed To Be Very Profitable And Ineffective

In response:

Reagan's Amnesty, Clinton's NAFTA, and Bush's DHS did not effectively stop illegal immigration. Does anyone trust that Washington and its reuse of previously failed "reform" strategies will finally fix this?

Three swings, three misses, you're out!

Yet current Washington hype and media chatter portray this reform not only a shoe-in, but a solid hit too. Is it possible that Washington is purposely attempting to "reform" illegal immigration again (especially Mexican illegal immigration) knowing that their decades old policies simply do not work?

At least two of the three previously mentioned administrations "wheeled and dealed" for substantial increases in border security and one for increased trade. Why do we still have 11 million undocumented here today?

 Washington either can't stop illegal immigration or it really doesn't want to. My money's on the later as that is how they get the most bang for OUR buck! Cronies simultaneously profit off of cheap labor and a "designed to be very profitable and ineffective " border security strategy.

Over 50% of the US undocumented are Mexican. The next highest groups are El Salvadoran and Guatemalan (via Mexico). Common sense dictates that home-country poverty pushes them here. Why doesn't "The Gang of 8" or the Whitehouse discuss poverty as the cause of illegal immigration at their hearings?

Do you think the undocumented from Mexico would come or stay here if they could make equivalent wages working at home with their families? Why do you guys let the corrupt Mexican government get away with this?

No comments:

Post a Comment